References
1. An average of 39% less squeeze force is required to close POWERSEAL jaws, when compared to leading competitive products. CJDA shows 36.7% reduction in force needed to close jaws, SJDA shows 28.9% reduction in force needed to close jaws and CJSA shows 52.2% reduction in force needed to close jaws, when compared to LigaSure, ENSEAL, and Voyant products.
2. Internal report DN0046457.
3. Internal report DN0056239.
4. Internal report DN0056240.
5. Internal report DN0056241.
6. Internal report DN0056242.
7. Internal report DN0056263.
8. Internal report DN0056264.
9. Internal report DN0044249.
10. Internal report DN0044289
11. Internal report DN0042457.
12. Internal report DN0054737
13. Internal report DN0054976
14. Internal report DN0044073
15. Internal report DN0056930
16. Internal report DN0044404
17. Internal report DN0044403
18. Internal report DN0024822 Attachment 1
19. Internal report DN0044705
20. POWERSEAL delivers, on average, 16.5% reduced reach distance to the cut trigger compared to LigaSure,ENSEAL X1, and Voyant devices.
21. POWERSEAL Curved & Straight Jaw designs, when compared to LigaSure Maryland Jaw & LigaSure Blunt Tip.
22. POWERSEAL CJSA and SJDA, when compared to their usual LigaSure device, 79% of surgeons agreed.
23. POWERSEAL CJDA, when compared to their usual nano-coated device, 100% of surgeons agreed. POWERSEAL CJSA and SJDA, when compared to their usual nano-coated device, 96% of surgeons agreed.
24. POWERSEAL Curved & Straight Jaw designs, 83% of surgeons agreed.